Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Overweight women, breast cancer, and drinking...bad combo

Speaking of breasts...
A recent study came out just recently adding another comorbidity to those who have a weight problem. If you drink alcohol 3-4 glasses of wine/or cans of beer per week, you have been previously diagnosed with breast cancer, you are at a higher (1.3 times higher) risk of getting a recurrence of your breast cancer.
They said in the article that estrogen sensitive cancer didn't have a role in the study, which I believe to be true. However, you need to know that having extra adipostiy (fat), increases the estrogen in your body due to the fat cells secreting estradiol. So, if you don't believe in hormone therapy due to having BC run in your family, then I suggest you lose the weight as to not predispose yourself to the disease.
The study showed that the more the women drank, the more predisposed of getting a recurrence. So, happy holliday's. Go now and encourage those post menopausal loved ones to live the word of wisdom and start a new years resolution.
Speaking of weight loss. There is another way besides the bariatric surgery where 1 in 10 people die as a cause from this operation. Look into the beta HCG diet. As with any diet and addiction (meaning eating), there is a need for will-power. But, it is a great way to lose weight to become eligible for the much safer "gastric lap band" procedure.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

The answer is...

A CHICKEN!
Just kidding. It was a big ball of fat called a LIPOMA which encompassed the omohyoid muscle, which ran through the middle of it.
It weighed 494 grams or a little over one pound. Since it acted like a tissue expander, extra skin you see on the specimen had to be remove for a nice cosmetic result. That is one photo I wish I had taken.

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Case of the week...the extra breast

Photo taken with permission
Okay not really an extra breast... but who can guess what this is? I think I will start compiling slides for a future presentation using this blogger format. We'll give it a test run.
This is a male, who had this soft fluctuant mass on the front of his neck for about the past 12 years. It has been slowly growing all of these years. The red dots are blood droplets where I injected the local anesthetic agent. Any takers? The answer soon to follow...

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Religion...the people's way

E Tu Brute? So God falls out of religion... or at least the Evangelical Lutheran church. After all, isn't moral and ethical codes so unfashionable? I mean, why don't we go with the flow? Why not just let women hold the priesthood. Whoa! Just dodged a bolt of lightening. IT SHOULD BE THE SAME CHURCH PEOPLE! God and his commandments don't change. The prophets of old such as Moses were MEN. Sodom and Gomorra BURNED TO THE GROUND FROM THIS TYPE OF WELCOMED BEHAVIOR!

CHICAGO - The presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is suggesting that the Bible isn't the last word on homosexuality.

In a town hall meeting Sunday, Bishop Mark Hanson said, "the understanding we have of homosexuality today does not seem to be reflected at all in the context of the biblical writers." Therefore, he said, Lutherans should consider more modern views on sexual orientation.

At its churchwide convention in August, the ELCA lifted its ban on partnered gay and lesbian clergy, prompting some traditional congregations to withhold funds and begin forming a separate denomination.

But Hanson insisted the ELCA can accommodate both views. In his words, "God is still speaking to us." He also suggests that more homosexual-friendly policies may help the denomination grow.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Hucky softy

Is Huckleberry the next "Jesus"? I mean, haven't we had enough of our current presidential savior? All we need is instead of a guy that can't make decisions, one that makes them wrong. (Okay, okay, I just gave Obama WAY TOO MUCH CREDIT!)

In regard to his answer as to his decision in 2000...It's one thing to say, "ya know, he seemed like he had a change of heart but turned out to be a scoundrel out and I'll be a bit more judicious next time." It's another thing to say, "if I were to do it all over again, I would do it again".

Why does a governor have so much power? So a governor is all of a sudden more omniscient, and has more experience than a judge? Do governors/presidents realize how hard it is to get someone booked in the slammer anyway? Just ask someone in law enforcement. It's hard scraping baked slime off the streets.

Huckabee's past may taint his future

by Jim Brown

A leading conservative pundit says fairly or not, former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee's political future has been badly damaged by fallout from an executive decision he made in 2000.

Conservative bloggers and pundits have been taking Mike Huckabee to task after a man whose sentence he commuted while Arkansas governor killed four police officers in Washington state over the weekend.

In a post on the conservative website Redstate.com yesterday, Huckabee expressed regret that he commuted the sentence of Maurice Clemmons and made him eligible for parole. However, Huckabee said the decision was based on evidence before him in 2000, and "if presented the same facts today, I would have acted in the same manner."

Huckabee also says that some of his fellow conservatives "don't seem to want to take responsibility for the facts surrounding the case," and are using "misinformed words" when accusing him of being weak on crime.


Erick Erickson, the editor of Redstate.com, believes perception is hurting Huckabee worse than the facts of the Clemmons case.

"I think the facts as known are not that bad, in that he gave clemency to the guy [Clemmons] when he was a teenager and was put in jail for over a hundred years for a simple burglary," Erickson notes. "The problem is that...this is now the second person [Huckabee] granted clemency to who went on to kill someone, and he's granted over a thousand pardons and clemencies, including 12 murderers. That taken together paints the picture of basically [Democratic presidential candidate] Michael Dukakis in 1988 -- someone who's soft on crime."

Even though Huckabee says all of the clemencies he granted were based on the facts of each individual case, Erickson points out that some Arkansas prosecutors and others who know the governor well say he had a propensity to grant clemency or give pardons to people who "found God in jail" and wanted to show mercy to them. According to Erickson, such an approach "would not fly

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Go Indrek...stick it to the violent Muslims

Go Professor Wichman! It's about time someone has the cajones to take the heat and at the same time put perspective back into view. What a giant of a leader. I'm very impressed!
Dear Muslim Association,As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU I intend to protest your protest.I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women (called 'whores' in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris France.This is what offends me, a soft-spoken person and academic, and many, many of my colleagues..I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Muslims to be very aware of this as you proceed with your infantile 'protests.'If you do not like the values of the West - see the 1st Amendment - you are free to leave. I hope for God's sake that most of you choose that option.Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.
Cordially,I. S. Wichman
Professor of Mechanical Engineering

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Alcohol....lets re-visit the subject

Finally, my isolated view in medical school is now becoming common practice...
One day when on a medical rotation some years ago, a fellow colleague and I were discussing a topic on the health benefits of alcohol. Albeit, there are some founded truths to it's benefits, I begged to disagree. The side effects of this drug outweigh the benefits. Especially when grape juice has the same antioxidant beneficial properties when compared to (a daily glass of) wine.
An older doctor walked into the lounge where we were having our discussion. He gave his two cents by defending the drug by citing studies he had read. I highly doubt he was an Emergency physician or a Trauma surgeon.
I found these two articles on Yahoo, of which sum up my thoughts on the "legalized drug", alcohol.

Royal Australasian College of Surgeons trauma committee head Daryl Wall said booze-fuelled violence was all too common and health workers were left to pick up the pieces.

Professor Wall said the PA Hospital at Woolloongabba had to deal with a steady stream of young victims early on Saturday and Sunday mornings, when people had been drinking for some time and the alcohol was starting to affect their judgment.

"It starts about one in the morning but they come in sometimes as late as Sunday evening because they finally sober up and realise they've been smashed up," he told brisbanetimes.com.au.

"In some instances a drunk male gets provoked by someone who's a superior boxer and the superior boxer gets to belt someone up, but they're cowards.

"Young men come in with very badly smashed faces, lacerated scalps and sometimes glassing injuries.

"We get 10 to 20 young people (on those busy mornings) with face wounds and scalp wounds, injured eyelids and lips waiting to be cared for.

"Surgeons rebuild eye sockets, noses, jaws and reattach portions of ears."

Sometimes, the injuries are so severe the victim dies.

But for other patients, the assaults leave long-lasting injuries that are untreatable.

"It's terrible to permanently lose your smell," said Professor Wall, the PA's director of surgical specialties.

Professor Wall said he despaired at the toll of alcohol-fuelled violence as seen in hospital emergency wings around the nation.

Evidence Against the Health Claim

by Jacquelyn Rudis

When analyzing the suggested benefits of moderate alcohol consumption on longevity, it is important to take into account the health effects of numerous other factors: diet, education and income level, health habits such as smoking and exercise, social engagement, and age. Many of the studies previously described found that although wine drinkers often have lower mortality rates than non-wine drinkers and abstainers, their lifestyles are also healthier overall, so it is hard to tell which factors are having the most healthful effect.

In Denmark (where the Copenhagen Heart Study took place), wine drinkers tend to consume a healthful, Mediterranean-style diet (high in fresh fruits and vegetables, fish, and olive oil, and low in meat and dairy products), and have high socioeconomic status. Klatsky’s California studies recognize that people who preferred to drink wine rather than beer or hard liquor were more highly educated, smoked less, and had more controlled drinking habits. Other studies have found that the benefits of alcohol consumption often depend on drinking patterns: Drinking slowly and with food has been shown to produce the greatest health benefits, and moderate wine drinkers reported consuming their glass or two of alcohol each day with meals.

Many proponents of wine as beneficial to health have pointed to the relatively low incidence of CHD in France, despite the typical French diet which is comparable to (or even worse than) other developed countries with high CHD rates. The French drink the most wine and have the highest level of total alcohol intake compared to 20 other industrialized countries, yet they also experience the second lowest CHD mortality rate. This phenomenon has been termed the “French Paradox”. It is important to note, however, that studies performed at the individual level have not consistently shown a positive connection between moderate wine consumption and longevity among the French. It is not clear, therefore, that a penchant for wine—red or otherwise—adequately explains the paradox.

Conclusion

While the evidence for the favorable health effects of moderate alcohol consumption is intriguing and deserves further study, it is unlikely that doctors will begin recommending a daily glass or two of wine to their patients anytime soon. There are at least three reasons for this.

First, since there are no randomized controlled trials on the subject (and probably never will be), it is not possible to prove a cause-and-effect relationship between alcoholic beverages and longevity. Many researchers and clinicians remain skeptical that that the alcohol itself is conferring the benefit. Patterns of drinking may simply be a marker for an unidentified attribute of the healthy drinker.

Second, the health benefits associated with moderate alcohol intake can also be obtained through safer habits such as exercise and a well-balanced diet. The antioxidant content of red wine is similar to that of fresh fruits and vegetables, and there are medications that can raise HDL levels and thin the blood more effectively than alcohol can.

Third (and most important), it is not currently possible to accurately predict who has a tendency to become an alcoholic and who does not. Recommending that all abstainers start drinking would be placing a significant number of them at unacceptable risk. For some, alcohol is an addictive drug, and alcoholism is a devastating condition that destroys lives and puts the public at risk.

So, my thoughts on legalizing marijuana? Should be evident by now. :) If not, take a moral and ethical pill and call me in the morning.

Reference: http://www.thirdage.com/nutrition/true-or-false-drinking-a-glass-of-red-wine-a-day-can-increase-longevity

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Friday, November 6, 2009

Typical government "hard" at work... you decide

Okay, got this in an email. Can someone either prove or disprove this for me? Maybe their computer screens were photoshopped. Even if they are Democrat, please tell me they are not as stupid as a 14 year old with his/her lip pierced. Ridiculous!

House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, pictured standing, far right, speaks while colleagues Rep. Barbara Lambert, D-Milford and Rep. Jack F. Hennessy, D-Bridgeport, play solitaire Monday night as the House convened to vote on a new budget. (AP) The guy sitting in the row in front of these two... he's on Facebook, and the guy behind Hennessy is checking out the baseball scores. These are the folks that can't get the budget out by Oct. 1, Seriously!!!

So, we've got a 30 day budget extension. Well, guess what, 30 days from now we will be in the same boat. I guess this makes it easy for the news reporters as all they have to do is recycle the same headlines from this week and from 2 years ago. And these yo-yo's will still be playing SOLITAIRE!!!

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Victory!

How sweet it is. To finally have a moral victory in all of the 31 states whom put it on the books to keep marriage defined between a man and a woman. Though how interesting it is how close the vote really was. Only 53%! It should have been much much higher than that! I mean, how far has our nation slid down the moral road of decay to not recognize the sacredness of marital union? Keep your civil union! Don't start calling a zebra a horse! As if the children of this day aren't confused enough already!
Gay marriage has now lost in every single state -- 31 in all -- in which it has been put to a popular vote. Gay-rights activists had hoped to buck that trend in Maine -- known for its liberal-minded electorate -- and mounted an energetic, well-financed campaign. With 87 percent of the precincts reporting, proponents of traditional marriage had 53 percent of the votes. "The institution of marriage has been preserved in Maine and across the nation," declared Frank Schubert, chief organizer for the winning side.

Addendum:
Well, the gay Judge overturned the vote of the people. Just like that. One man in a very powerful position, right before leaving office. For his last hoorah, said, yup, if you're gay, California should be another place to publish and practice your moral decay. And a great place to teach sexual ambiguity to children. NICE!

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Has Nancy Pelosi grown horns on her head?

Maybe just a forked tongue and a large knife ready to stab the nation in the back. I actually turned off the radio, refused to watch the national news, and checking the web for a couple of weeks in order to get my spirits up. Then to have them dashed by my neighbors asking me about what I thought of what's going on. So, like the ostrich pulling his head out of the sand as a lion charges, I decided to look up some news sent to me recently.
Has our world gone mad? Okay, I realize that insurance companies are selfish pigs looking out for themselves...but at the same time, with only 2-6% profit margins? Is that really selfish? Yes something needs to be done to help the system out, but COME ON! Making lawyers more powerful in suits by mandating states who take fed money not able to pass TORT reforms? Seriously, insanity has struck! Making this nation greater does not occur by crippling it first.
No offense to my lawyer friends out there, but how much more moisture can be sucked out of beef jerky? Who wants to go through 8 years of post high school learning and 3-5 more years of residency training to get their underwear pulled over their head? Get it? No docs, no care. Simple aint it? Look to the stories coming down from our neighbors from the north who did a trial run for us already. It's a BROKEN SYSTEM! I could go on and on here...but I have a presentation to prepare for tomorrow... maybe more rantings to come.
The Wall Street Journal is calling Nancy Pelosi's 1,990-page government takeover of healthcare the "worst piece of post-New Deal legislation ever introduced." The Journal says it will create an "unrepealable middle class entitlement" that will cause taxes to "rise precipitously" and will result in "all medicine" being "rationed via politics." The CBO cost estimate is coming in at $1.055 trillion and that's just scratching the surface. The Journal says "ObamaCare will be lucky to cost under $2 trillion over 10 years; it will grow more after that." Go here to access Wall Street Journal's excellent analysis of what it calls the "worst bill ever": Read/download the bill here

Sunday, October 25, 2009

The BS (basic science) of Jenny

So, do vaccines cause Autism?
Should you refuse to have your child vaccinated?
Which is worse?
Silly silly stuff. Enough of the Hollywood hyped up crapola that comes across the boob-tube! Jenny McCarthy is full of emotional bonkychonk which is convincing way too many gullible Grey's Anatomy enthusiasts. (you know who you are) And by the way, NO, that show is nothing like real life.
So, in a nutshell, the CDC confirms that there is no correlation. If you want to keep your conspiracy theory tucked in your belt, then go right ahead. Just don't feed it to the rest of the population. Why you may ask? Lets just take a little step into the past before measles, polio, and pertussis etc. existed...
PERTUSSIS
Bug=Bordetella Pertusis; Symptoms= "Whooping cough"
In the prevaccination era, 1.7million people came down with the illness, of which 73,000 deaths were a result.
In the postvaccination era, 34,325 children came down with it, and 56 deaths resulted.
Ref: http://www.jstor.org/pss/4481904
Measles...need I say more than this graph? If you can't read it's small print, the summary is this. 5,784,000 world wide annual deaths from it. Now there are 960,479 deaths. For Americas, it was 695,000 and 61 pre and post vaccination era's respectively. Yeah, wow is right.
I could go on and on here. Bottom of the line is, get your kids vaccinated, and if you happen to be in Hollywood and decide to talk like an idiot, sit down and take a refresher course in history before misleading the rest of the world.

Swine Flu

Just want to throw my opinion out there...
The Hype
-Vaccines are a good thing. People who say differently have not remembered the history of this world or nation in the pre vaccination era. There were many many many deaths and disorders that came from illnesses caused by the vaccinations we now offer and take for granted.
----Now, having said this, there is a lot of hype over this Swine Flu (AKA: H1N1, or Influenza A) pandemic. In talking to some of the most respected Emergency Medicine physicians, they don't even give Tamiflu (drug given within 48 hours after onset of the Type A or B flu), the drug to help shorten the flu symptoms. Their reasoning? The H1N1 isn't that bad. As a matter of fact, you probably had it yourself already.
The conspiracytheory
-If the book Rainbow Six comes to mind then you have some reason to fear. ;)
Now, here is some info from MD Consult (physicians on-line reference).

Alternative Names

Swine flu; Influenza A

Causes

Earlier forms of the H1N1 virus were found in pigs. Over time, the virus changed (mutated) and can now infect humans. Because H1N1 is a new virus in humans, your immune system cannot fight the virus very well. As a result, it has spread quickly around the world.

The largest number of H1N1 flu cases have occurred in people ages 5 - 24. Few cases, and no deaths, have been reported in people older than age 64.

The H1N1 flu virus can spread from person to person when:

  • Someone with the flu coughs or sneezes into air that others breathe in.

  • Someone touches a door knob, desk, computer, or counter with the H1N1 germs on it and then touches their mouth, eyes, or nose.

  • Someone touches mucus of a child or others while taking care of them when they are ill with the H1N1 flu virus

You CANNOT get H1N1 flu virus from eating pork or any other food, drinking water, swimming in pools, or using a hot tubs or saunas.

Symptoms

Symptoms of H1N1 flu infection in humans are similar to classic flu-like symptoms, which might include:

  • Fever above 100.4 °F

  • Cough

  • Sore throat

  • Runny or stuffy nose

  • Headache

  • Chills

  • Muscle aches and fatigue

  • Diarrhea

  • Vomiting

Exams and Tests

If you think you have been exposed to H1N1 influenza, call your health care provider before your visit. The medical staff may want to take proper precautions to protect themselves and other patients during your office visit.

Because the H1N1 flu has become widespread, most people do not need to be tested for it when they have symptoms.

Your doctor may test you for the H1N1 flu virus by swabbing the back of the inside of your nose if:

  • You are at high risk for flu complications.

  • Others at high risk of flu complications have been in close contact with you.

  • You are very sick.

Your doctor may:

  • Look in your mouth, throat, nose, and ears

  • Listen to your lungs

  • Perform a chest x-ray

Treatment

Most people who get H1N1 flu will likely recover without needing medical care or special antiviral medications. Check with your health care provider about whether you should take antiviral medications to treat the H1N1 flu.

Doctors may prescribe antiviral drugs to treat people who become very sick with the flu or are at high risk for flu complications. The following people may be at high risk:

  • Children younger than 5 years old, especially those younger than age 2

  • Adults 65 years of age and older

  • People with:

    • Chronic lung (including asthma) or heart conditions (except high blood pressure)

    • Kidney, liver, neurologic, and neuromuscular conditions

    • Blood disorders (including sickle cell disease)

    • Diabetes and other metabolic disorders

    • An immune system that does not work well, such as AIDS patients or cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Other high risk people include:

  • Pregnant women

  • Anyone younger than age 19 receiving long-term aspirin therapy

  • Residents of nursing homes and other chronic-care facilities

People who may receive antiviral medications after coming into close contact with a person who is known to have, or probably is infected with the H1N1 virus, include:

  • Those at high risk for complications of influenza

  • Health care workers, public health workers, or first responders

Oseltamivir or zanamivir are the two drugs recommended for the treatment or prevention of infection with the H1N1, or swine, influenza virus.

People with H1N1 flu should also:

  • Get plenty of rest

  • Drink clear fluids (such as water, broth, sports drinks, and electrolyte beverages for infants)

  • Watch for emergency warning signs (see below)

There ya go. Happy Fall, Haloween, and beginnings of Winter.

Friday, October 9, 2009

White males listen up!

Okay, white boys, eat your green leafy vegetables like your mama taught you!  

Noise Hurts Men's Hearing More, Study Shows

Married white guys are especially at risk for noise-induced hearing loss, research finds

Posted October 5, 2009

MONDAY, Oct. 5 (HealthDay News) -- New research suggests that men -- especially married white men -- are much more likely to develop noise-induced hearing loss than women. But there's some good news: Another study finds that older men who take high doses of folate can decrease their risk of hearing loss by 20 percent...

...Foods with high levels of folate include leafy vegetables such as spinach, lettuce and asparagus; dried or fresh beans; peas; liver products; and fortified cereal products.

The researchers pointed out that their study is the largest to look into links between diet and hearing loss.

But they might not have taken this into account...click on the link below...

How married men really lose their hearing

Conservative and Liberal comparison

Thanks Jennerator!  This was too funny, mixed with some blatant truths, to not share with you all.  From Neil Bortz...
  • "No, I didn't write this. I wish I did. Because it's the painful truth. And you know how much I love to stir the puddin'. This list was actually forwarded to me from a friend of mine … Ain't this the truth?"
  • If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one.
  • If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
  • If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't` eat meat.
  • If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.
  • If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his enemy.
  • If a liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good.
  • If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
  • If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.
  • If a person of color is conservative, they see themselves as independently successful. Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need
  • of government protection.
  • If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.
  • If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.
  • If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)
  • If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it. A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
  • If a conservative slips and falls in a store, he gets up, laughs and is embarrassed. If a liberal slips and falls, he grabs his neck, moans like he's in labor and then sues.

Monday, October 5, 2009

Oldie but Goodie...Oklahoma version

OKLAHOMA HIGHWAY PATROL vs NEW YORK LAWYER                                     A lawyer runs a stop sign and gets pulled over by an OHP.   He thinks that he is smarter than the Officer because he is a lawyer from New York and is certain that he has a better education then any cop from Oklahoma.   He decides to prove this to himself and have some fun at the OHP's expense.   The Officer says, "License and registration, please."  "What for?" says the lawyer.   The Officer says, "You didn't come to a complete stop at the stop sign."   Then the lawyer says, "I slowed down, and no one was coming."   "You still didn't come to a complete stop," says the Officer. "License and registration, please.."    The lawyer says, "What's the difference?"   "The difference is you have to come to complete stop, that's the law. License and registration, please!" the Officer repeats.   Lawyer says, "If you can show me the legal difference between slow down and stop, I'll give you my license and registration; and you give me the ticket. If not, you let me go and don't give me the ticket."   "That sounds fair. Please exit your vehicle, sir," the Officer says.     At this point, the Officer takes out his nightstick and starts  beating the daylights out of the lawyer and says,  "Do you want me to stop, or just slow down?"      God Bless Oklahoma

Monday, September 21, 2009

Giving too much stuff and not enough time

Now that I'm home taking care of my wife and children in need... I caught a glimpse of Dr. Phil.  Yes the doctor that knows little if anything about medicine other than what is a band-aide.  
He was interviewing a woman whom had lost all hope with her child.  Her child was now doing everything in her power to make every choice a bad one.  She was finally arrested for some of her deeds.  So the big doctor asked her why this had happened.  Her reply...She had given it all to her child.  Every material thing she could afford to give was given.  She summed it up with the intriguingly concise sentence. "I gave her everything except for my time".  
I have discussed this with my wife and mother in law at length.  Our parents generation was never given anything materialistic that they didn't have to earn on with their own sweat and tears.  So when they grew up, what did they do?  They overcompensated and doled out everything materialistic in attempts to give them what they didn't have.  
I think they are missing the point.  They are successful today because of the fact that they had to earn their success.  Their parents worked hard.  However that is just a fraction of my point here.  I would like to point out that distractions were a minimum in those days.  No TV, Playstation, cell phones, or iPod.  Communication and travel outside of the home was expensive and therefore kept to a minimum.  A prime example of this was my grandma who passed away a few years ago.  When I called her, our conversation was always very brief.  Why you may ask?  Because she was asocial (not antisocial-a missnomer meaning fighting against social norms)?  NO! Again, because of the aforementioned cost.  It was a habit to keep conversation short to keep cost down.  I digress... Back to my point.     
Our children deserve our time, not materialistic gifts that are aimed at compensating for the void in time.  Activities such as eating dinner together, doing homework together, and attending extracurricular events are imperative in their growth.  This means not only attending the extracurricular event, but participating.  In that time with them, you not only bond in friendship with them, but also find out what their friends are up to, what they are being taught, and what they feel is important in life.
How about that for a random post!

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Health care for everyone!

Okay, like my previous statement about healthcare for everyone...after that, I propose free car tune ups for everyone!  THEN we'll see how fast and efficient our cars will be tuned up.   Might as well become your own mechanic.  
I agree that Health care needs reform. Here's something to chew on...
TORT REFORM!  Stop all the frivolous law suits.  Stop suing doctors because your baby comes out looking like you!
BUILD A WALL!  Illegal influx is killing us!  Do you know how many illegals I see every day in our clinic just in Oklahoma (because I speak spanish) whom are using state insurance (medicaid-Oklahoman tax payers thank you very much)?  The people are sweet, but the policy is killing our nation.
ILLEGAL BOOT CAMP!  Learn english, love our country, serve in the military, and become one of us!  Then let the U.S. welcome them with open arms.  None of this Amnesty nonesense... Click here for the nonsense

Sunday, September 13, 2009

To lose trust...

"To be trusted is a greater quality than to be loved".  I think I misquoted this (there is another word instead of quality), but it drives the point home.  For me, the President of the United States should be someone who represents the moral, ethical, and all around values of the American people.  When a president equivocates due to being given misinformation, I understand this and can forgive him very easily.  However, when falsehoods are jammed down my throat and is plain as the writing on the wall that they are false...It really chaps my hide.  
When "Slick Willy" lied about his affair with Monica, it not only was a moral disgrace for the national face of our nation, but to lose the trust by lying about it to the people was the tipping point for me.  I can no longer trust anything that comes out of his mouth.
The same goes for Barack Hussein Obama...
Here's a report in regards to his "cram HIS health care plan down our throat" speech.
Rich Noyes, director of research at the MRC, says The Associated Press did do a fact check on his speech.   Rich Noyes (Media Research Center)"[The AP story suggests] that he uttered 'a variety of over simplifications and omissions,'" says Noyes. "He talked about how he would not add a single dime to the deficit, when the studies are showing it would add about a trillion dollars to the deficit over the second year of the plan. He talked about not permitting any illegal immigrant to be covered, when in fact it was Democrats who voted down any attempt to verify immigration status."   "The list of things that he talked about [was] very misleading," the MRC spokesman concludes, "added to the arrogant veneer of him scolding anybody else for taking liberties with the truth as liars, as he did."   Noyes says Obama's speech was about as "audacious" as one could possibly get. He says while the AP did do its fact check, there has been little coverage from the mainstream media on Obama taking liberty with the facts during his speech. Until that happens, says MRC, it gives the president "a green light to lie and cry wolf about whatever he wants, whenever he wants -- and it will aid in the most radical government takeover ever attempted in America."
Oh, and by the way, Mr. Rodgers from Michigan I believe it is...hit the nail on the head. Thanks for the send Jennerator

Sunday, August 30, 2009

I love Catholics...I'm not a fan of Ted Kennedy

A man who is chronically drunk, commits several crimes worthy of jail time by drinking and causing a death, and touted to be fighting for "the people" (poor people) when he was living above the system, has lost all of my respect.  He worked in an extreamly lavish offices with marble everything, beautiful wooden panel walls, and carpet you could sleep on comfortably to name just a few.  Last time I checked, our public officers were not kings.  
Should he be touted as a Hero?  Well, I guess Michael Jackson was.  Apparently our nation is okay with morally sloven public figures who speak out of both sides of their mouths.
Let the man rest in peace, and let us move on.  I'm sure he had good intentions during his lifelong career of politics, but that doesn't excuse his slithering around the law and moral askew motives.
Not only do I have great friends who are of the Catholic faith, but I share much in common with their moral beliefs.  Ted Kennedy may have been a self proclaimed "Catholic", but like so many of my faith who decide to go "Jack", he didn't practice it.  I can't put it any better than this courageous Catholic priest.  

A Catholic pro-life leader has some scathing words concerning Senator Ted Kennedy's Catholic funeral.

 

Thomas Euteneuer, president of Human Life International, released this statement concerning Senator Kennedy. "We must, as a matter of precept, pray for the salvation of heretical Catholics like Senator Edward Kennedy, but we do not have to praise him, let alone extol him with the full honors of a public Catholic funeral and all the adulation that attends such an event."   He adds that while Senator Kennedy called himself Catholic, like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Joe Biden, they are actually wolves in sheep's clothing.   "They do not hold to the teaching of the church. They, in fact, take every opportunity seemingly to contradict the teaching of our church," Euteneuer says. "So in the case of Senator Edward Kennedy, he was not only against his church's teaching on the issue of abortion, but the same with embryonic stem cell research, the same with gay marriage andThomas Euteneuer (Human Life International) various other issues which set him in diametric opposition to his church's very well-defined and clearly articulated teaching."   Euteneuer says he is speaking out now to remind everyone that Catholics cannot honor a person with a full and public Catholic funeral when, like Senator Kennedy, he really was not.

 

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

How long do you want to wait?

If you don't pay with money, you pay with time. If you don't have money, then you spend hours and hours searching for that one person/company that will take you in and help you. If you don't have insurance, then you go to one of the Government run health agencies and wait, and wait, and wait. That wait, could get much much much longer. And the quality? Not even a submarine could go that low. Obama medical plan...yeah, it's brutal. Click here. If anyone is a fan of Canada's socialized medicine, I suggest one of two or perhaps both of two things... 1)MOVE THERE! 2)Talk to someone who lives there. The latter has helped me understand how good we have it right now. Perfect system? I think far from it. But to make it worse copying or mimicking their sytem? I think is very irresponsible.

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Alex Jones...another "nut job"

No, not just a nut...a super freak nut.
There are Ultra Liberals, such as Barack Obama.  Then there are the Ultra Right extreamists like Alex Jones.  In between you have most of Americans such as democrat, republican, libertarian, conservative etc.  
Somehow this Alex Jones is being attached to the conservative side of things.  That is not a good thing.  What do you think?

Friday, August 7, 2009

Greedy little blood suckers

And no, I'm not talking about phlebotomists or mosquitos...although the latter is very descriptive of them. Yes, I'm talking about all those thoughtless and careless governmental officials who passed the stimulus package without thought of recompense.  So, what do they do?  They see an opportunity to infringe on our freedoms once again, and jump on it!  What?  Something we haven't taxed yet?  Are we idiots?  Lets suck the nation dry!  

LET PEOPLE DO WHAT THEY WANT WITH THEIR MONEY!!!

You see, this is the problem I had with the tobacco tax.  Yes, people need to stop smoking, it causes severe problems.  But it is a perfectly legitimate and legal company.  People are free to make crappy decisions, whether well informed or not.  Let me tell you, everyone who smokes knows it's not good.  They aren't well informed, but informed none the less.  Especially when it comes to exposing their kids to second hand smoke...okay, I'm getting riled and heading off subject here.  So I ask, what are they going to tax next?  Soda pop (fat tax), the air (carbon tax), etc.?  What the devil!?!  They are running out of things to tax, so, they jump on those who want to pay out of pocket to look better. 

So, lets think about the cascade of events logic...Ut oh, beware, here comes some common sense.  And boy has it been lost in my generation and below.  So, you tax the wealthy, so they stop getting as many procedures.  Now there is the surgeon who owns a surgery center, creating 20 plus jobs directly for people in the community, and countless others through maintenance personnel, financial personnel, etc.  So, what happens when the hard working Americans get tax punishment for overachievement?  The cost gets passed on to you.  Always!  Do you feel Taxed Enough Already?  

Plastic Surgery Tax Eyed As Revenue Raiser

Face-lifts, tummy tucks and hair transplants could be hit with a new tax to help finance the trillion-dollar healthcare overhaul plan, according to sources familiar with the Senate talks.

The Senate Finance Committee has discussed imposing a 10 percent excise tax on cosmetic surgery deemed unnecessary for medical purposes. The idea was broached in a meeting with OMB Director Orszag in mid-July, after which Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus told reporters he had heard some "interesting," "creative," and "kind of fun" ideas.

The tax, which has not been officially scored, would plug some of the revenue gap senators are seeking to fill to keep on schedule for a markup the week of Aug. 3. It would target procedures prohibited under Section 213 of the tax code, which deals with itemized deductions for medical expenses not covered by health insurance.